3 Reasons I’m Buying Amazon Over and Over Until Late 2026

3 Reasons I’m Buying Amazon Over and Over Until Late 2026 Alex SiroisMon, July 20, 2026 at 9:27 PM UTC 0 ThinkstockQuick Read Amazon&x27;s custom silicon business hit a $20 billion annualized run rate with tripledigit growth, yet the market still prices AMZN like a retailer. Trainium chips deliver 30% better price performance than Nvidia&x27;s GPUs, transferring gross margin from NVDA&x27;s income statement directly to AMZN&x27;s. Five straight EPS beats and a $364 billion AWS backlog justify buying AMZN despite $200 billion in planned 2026 CapEx crushing free cash flow 95%.

3 Reasons I’m Buying Amazon Over and Over Until Late 2026

Alex SiroisMon, July 20, 2026 at 9:27 PM UTC

0

ThinkstockQuick Read -

Amazon's custom silicon business hit a $20 billion annualized run rate with triple-digit growth, yet the market still prices AMZN like a retailer.

Trainium chips deliver 30% better price performance than Nvidia's GPUs, transferring gross margin from NVDA's income statement directly to AMZN's.

Five straight EPS beats and a $364 billion AWS backlog justify buying AMZN despite $200 billion in planned 2026 CapEx crushing free cash flow 95%.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Amazon didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

I keep hitting the buy button on Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), and my brokerage statement shows exactly how many times. The reason is simple. I think the market still misreads what this company has quietly become. Amazon has turned into a vertically integrated silicon company that happens to own the world's most valuable enterprise sales channel, and every quarter through late 2026 keeps proving the case.

The core thesis pulls me back every time. Amazon's custom silicon lines (Trainium and Graviton) have crossed an annualized revenue run rate above $20 billion with triple-digit year-over-year growth. Management said plainly that this "custom silicon business is now one of the top three data center chip businesses in the world". That business is sitting inside a retailer's ticker, and I am accumulating it before Wall Street reprices it.

The Data That Keeps Refilling My Position

Three data points do the heavy lifting. First, AWS grew 28% year over year in Q1 2026 to $37.59 billion, its fastest pace in 15 quarters, at a $150 billion annualized run rate and a 37.7% operating margin. Growth on that base is rare.

Second, the backlog. Q1 AWS backlog stood at $364 billion, and that figure excludes the $100 billion-plus Anthropic deal. Trainium commitments alone total over $225 billion. This is contracted future revenue from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Uber.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Amazon didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

Advertisement

Third, the margin story. Company-wide operating margin hit 13.1%, the highest ever, on operating income of $23.85 billion. EPS came in at $2.78 versus a $1.73 estimate, the fifth consecutive beat. Trainium2 delivers roughly 30% better price performance than comparable GPUs, and management expects the chip program to save tens of billions of dollars of CapEx each year plus "several hundred basis points of operating margin advantage" at scale.

Why Not the Obvious Alternative

The reflexive AI trade is NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA). I still respect the picks-and-shovels case. I just prefer the customer quietly closing the price gap on its supplier. Trainium2 is largely sold out, Trainium3 is nearly fully subscribed, and almost 80% of Bedrock workloads run on Trainium. Every wafer AWS ships at a 30% better price performance point transfers gross margin from Nvidia's income statement to Amazon's. That value reshoring is what I am buying.

The Risk I Am Not Waving Off

The concern I take seriously is capital intensity. Amazon plans roughly $200 billion of CapEx in 2026. TTM free cash flow fell 95% to $1.2 billion. Long-term debt climbed to $119.1 billion from $65.6 billion. Management already has customer commitments for a substantial portion of that capacity, data centers carry 30-plus year useful lives, and Andy Jassy has been direct: "We have been through this cycle with the first big AWS growth wave, and we like the results." I lived through that first cycle as a shareholder. I like how it ended.

What Keeps the Buy Button Active

At a P/E near 30 with quarterly earnings growth of 74.8% year over year, 62 buy ratings, zero sell ratings, and an analyst target of $314.27, one ticker gets me a hyperscaler, a top-three chip company, a $70 billion-plus ad business growing 24%, and the second-largest grocer in the U.S. I keep buying because five straight EPS beats, a $364 billion backlog, and $20 billion in captive silicon revenue are receipts, and receipts are what my retirement account runs on.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Amazon didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

Contact editorial@247wallst.com for any questions or corrections.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Money"

Read More

---

Source: Money

Published: July 21, 2026 at 01:19AM on Source: RED MAG

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

byRed Roads Media

in

4:00 PM

3 Reasons I’m Buying Amazon Over and Over Until Late 2026

3 Reasons I’m Buying Amazon Over and Over Until Late 2026 Alex SiroisMon, July 20, 2026 at 9:27 PM UTC 0 ThinkstockQuick Read A...

Read More

Judge orders Paramount and Warner merger to halt for 2 weeks, granting states’ request

Judge orders Paramount and Warner merger to halt for 2 weeks, granting states’ request Christine Samra Mon, July 20, 2026 at 8:06 PM UTC 0 A federal judge on Monday ordered Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery to halt their $81 billion merger for at least two weeks. This is to allow states that are challenging the deal more time to see their case through in court. Last week, 12 states sued to block Paramount’s pending buyout of Warner. The move is being led by California.

Judge orders Paramount and Warner merger to halt for 2 weeks, granting states’ request

Christine Samra Mon, July 20, 2026 at 8:06 PM UTC

0

A federal judge on Monday ordered Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery to halt their $81 billion merger for at least two weeks. This is to allow states that are challenging the deal more time to see their case through in court.

Last week, 12 states sued to block Paramount’s pending buyout of Warner. The move is being led by California. The states claim that the merger would “extinguish competition” in Hollywood and lead to fewer choices for consumers, particularly moviegoers and cable customers across the U.S.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta requested that the merger not close until after a judge fully evaluated their claims. When the two media giants refused, the states filed a restraining order, which was granted by District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín on Monday.

The temporary restraining order pumps the brakes on the deal for 14 days, but it could be extended up to 28 days. An Aug. 3 hearing has been set for the states’ preliminary injunction motion; however, that could be pushed back.

“This is a critical first win in our case to ensure this megamerger never sees the light of day,” Bonta said in a statement. “History tells the tale of what happens when a few people have great power over markets that are central to Americans’ lives: fewer opportunities for more people, worse products and services for all people.”

The other states joining the Golden State in this lawsuit are Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Washington.

Advertisement

The lawsuit alleges the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which prohibits mergers that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly.

The Writers Guild of America has also filed a lawsuit to block the merger.

In February, Paramount won the bid for the merger after Netflix pulled out.

KTLA 5 has reached out to Paramount and Warner Bros. about the pause.

The contributed to this report.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to KTLA.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Money"

Read More

---

Source: Money

Published: July 21, 2026 at 12:19AM on Source: RED MAG

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

byRed Roads Media

in

3:00 PM

Judge orders Paramount and Warner merger to halt for 2 weeks, granting states’ request

Judge orders Paramount and Warner merger to halt for 2 weeks, granting states’ request Christine Samra Mon, July 20, 2026 at 8:0...

Read More

I Keep Buying Amazon Because AI Capex Fears Were Never Real From The Start

I Keep Buying Amazon Because AI Capex Fears Were Never Real From The Start Alex SiroisMon, July 20, 2026 at 5:55 PM UTC 0 monsitj / iStock via Getty ImagesQuick Read AMZN&x27;s $364 billion AWS backlog plus $225 billion in Trainium commitments already dwarf the feared $200 billion 2026 capex. AWS&x27;s 28% growth outpaces MSFT&x27;s 18% and GOOGL&x27;s 22%, yet all three trade at comparable trailing P/E multiples near 30. Amazon&x27;s Trainium chip business crossed a $20 billion annual run rate and will save tens of billions in yearly capex versus buying outside GPUs.

I Keep Buying Amazon Because AI Capex Fears Were Never Real From The Start

Alex SiroisMon, July 20, 2026 at 5:55 PM UTC

0

monsitj / iStock via Getty ImagesQuick Read -

AMZN's $364 billion AWS backlog plus $225 billion in Trainium commitments already dwarf the feared $200 billion 2026 capex.

AWS's 28% growth outpaces MSFT's 18% and GOOGL's 22%, yet all three trade at comparable trailing P/E multiples near 30.

Amazon's Trainium chip business crossed a $20 billion annual run rate and will save tens of billions in yearly capex versus buying outside GPUs.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Amazon didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

I keep buying Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) because the loudest bear case against it, that $200 billion in 2026 capex will torch shareholder returns, was already answered by the company's own contract book. I have been adding on every wobble because the receipts explain why this spending cycle is closer to a pre-sold order book than a moonshot.

The Backlog Is the Whole Argument

AWS has pre-sold much of this capacity before pouring concrete. On the Q1 call, Andy Jassy said the AWS backlog stood at $364 billion, excluding the recently announced $100 billion+ Anthropic deal. Amazon has disclosed $225 billion in revenue commitments for Trainium alone. When I hear "$200 billion of capex," I read it against a contracted demand pile that dwarfs it. Jassy said it plainly: "We have high confidence this will be monetized well, as we already have customer commitments for a substantial portion of it."

Revenue Is Already Moving

The velocity convinces me this is a near-term story. AWS grew 28% year over year in Q1 2026, its fastest pace in 15 quarters, on a $150 billion annualized run rate. The AI slice inside AWS is already at a $15 billion+ run rate, and Bedrock saw 170% growth in customer spend quarter over quarter. Consolidated operating margin hit 13.1%, the highest ever, and full-year 2025 operating cash flow reached $139.5 billion. That is the cash engine funding the buildout.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Amazon didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

The Silicon Moat Nobody Prices In

Custom chips crossed a $20 billion annual run rate and grew nearly 40% quarter over quarter. Jassy told analysts Trainium "will save us tens of billions of dollars of CapEx each year and provide several hundred basis points of operating margin advantage" versus buying outside silicon. Trainium2 is largely sold out, Trainium3 is nearly fully subscribed, and Graviton runs inside 98% of the top 1,000 EC2 customers. That is a structural cost advantage over any hyperscaler paying full freight for GPUs.

Advertisement

Why Not Microsoft or Alphabet

The obvious alternatives are Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL). I own some of both and still keep adding Amazon. Microsoft's most recent quarterly revenue grew 18.3% year over year, and Alphabet's grew 21.8%. Amazon's AWS is growing faster than both at 28%, yet Amazon trades at a trailing P/E of 30, close to Microsoft at 23 and Alphabet at 26, without a proprietary silicon revenue stream on Trainium's scale. That valuation setup, paired with the fastest cloud growth of the three, keeps my capital flowing to AMZN first.

The Risk I Own With Open Eyes

Free cash flow is the visible bruise. TTM free cash flow fell to $1.2 billion, down 95%, because property and equipment purchases jumped $59.3 billion year over year. Long-term debt climbed to $119.1 billion from $65.6 billion. If AI monetization stalls, the payback window stretches. Jassy addressed this directly: capex funds assets with "many-year useful lives, 30-plus years for data centers, five to six years for chips, servers, and networking gear," and the free cash flow shows up a couple of years after capacity comes online. I have watched Amazon run this playbook before, and the compounding on the other side is why I stay.

Why the Buy Button Stays Warm

Polymarket traders assign a 93.5% probability to Amazon beating its next quarter, and analyst consensus sits at 62 buy ratings and zero sells. My conviction is simpler. A $364 billion backlog, a $20 billion chip business, and an AI run rate already north of $15 billion tell me the capex was pre-sold, and I intend to keep buying the receipts.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Amazon didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

Contact editorial@247wallst.com for any questions or corrections.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Money"

Read More

---

Source: Money

Published: July 21, 2026 at 12:19AM on Source: RED MAG

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

byRed Roads Media

in

3:00 PM

I Keep Buying Amazon Because AI Capex Fears Were Never Real From The Start

I Keep Buying Amazon Because AI Capex Fears Were Never Real From The Start Alex SiroisMon, July 20, 2026 at 5:55 PM UTC 0 mon...

Read More

Judge says Paramount and Warner must halt merger for at least two weeks, granting states' request

Judge says Paramount and Warner must halt merger for at least two weeks, granting states&x27; request By WYATTE GRANTHAMPHILIPS Mon, July 20, 2026 at 8:40 PM UTC 0 NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge on Monday ordered Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery to halt their $81 billion merger for at least two weeks, allowing states that are challenging the deal more time to see their case through in court.

Judge says Paramount and Warner must halt merger for at least two weeks, granting states' request

By WYATTE GRANTHAM-PHILIPS Mon, July 20, 2026 at 8:40 PM UTC

0

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge on Monday ordered Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery to halt their $81 billion merger for at least two weeks, allowing states that are challenging the deal more time to see their case through in court.

Twelve states, led by California, sued to block Paramount’s pending buyout of Warner last week — alleging that such a combination would “extinguish competition” in Hollywood and lead to fewer choices for consumers, particularly moviegoers and cable customers across the U.S.

The states’ top prosecutors called on Warner and Paramount to not close the transaction until after a court had time to fully evaluate their claims. And when the companies refused, they filed for a temporary restraining order — which is what District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín granted on Monday. That opens the door to a potential preliminary injunction that the states are also seeking to effectively block the deal.

“This is a critical first win in our case to ensure this megamerger never sees the light of day,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement Monday. “History tells the tale of what happens when a few people have great power over markets that are central to Americans’ lives: fewer opportunities for more people, worse products and services for all people.”

A Warner-Paramount tie-up would bring together two of the five last legacy studios in Hollywood — as well as a host of TV networks, titles filling streaming libraries and news operations. Warner’s HBO Max, fan favorites like “Harry Potter” and even CNN would come under the same roof of Paramount-owned CBS, movies like “Top Gun” and the Paramount+ streaming service.

Paramount, which was bought out by Skydance just last year, has vowed to vigorously defend its acquisition — and touts regulatory greenlights the deal has received elsewhere, including from President Donald Trump's administration last month.

On Monday, Paramount said the states' antitrust arguments “are without merit” or “any basis in modern market realities" — and maintained that its merger with Warner will benefit consumers and workers alike. Timing for next steps also falls in line with the company's previous requests.

Deal is paused for at least two weeks

The temporary restraining order granted Monday halts the deal from progressing for at least 14 days, although the pause could be extended for up to 28 days. The court has set Aug. 3 as a date for a hearing on the states' preliminary injunction motion, but that schedule could also be pushed back.

The clock is ticking. Ahead of Monday’s decision, the companies proposed wrapping up a preliminary injunction hearing by the end of August, leaving time to make a possible appeal by Sept. 30 — a date on the top of Paramount’s mind because it’s pledged to pay shareholders added “ticking fee” compensation amounting to about $7 million per day if the deal isn’t closed by then.

But the states called such a timeline unprecedented and unfair. They maintain that payments Paramount might have to incur after Sept. 30 were the risk of a decision the company made on its own — and argued in a hearing held Friday that commencing a trial in April 2027 would allow enough time for discovery and presenting proper evidence.

Including billions of dollars in debt, Paramount’s proposed purchase of Warner is currently valued at nearly $111 billion based on outstanding shares.

Advertisement

What the states are challenging

Paramount has repeatedly pointed to tech and streaming companies’ growing reach across the entertainment industry — and argues that merging with Warner would particularly help it compete with bigger rivals like Netflix. Last week, it said the states’ challenge would help shield Netflix and others “who have harmed the market for theatrical exhibition” from meaningful competition.

The states’ case doesn’t focus on streaming. It alleges that a combined Paramount-Warner merger violates federal antitrust law because of what the companies’ combined reach would become across three markets: theatrical movie distribution, theater releases of bigger blockbusters and the licensing of basic cable channels.

Their complaint says a combined Paramount-Warner could control nearly a third of both the theatrical film distribution market as well as basic cable programming. The states argued this would create a “media behemoth" with enough power to both raise prices for consumers and threaten workers’ wages, while reducing production and quality of content.

In terms of movie theater releases, Paramount’s lawyers have pointed to a growing list of blockbuster hits from studios that are not in Hollywood’s “big five,” such as A24 and Amazon’s MGM. The states maintain the core legacy studios — which beyond Warner and Paramount include Disney, Universal and Sony — still make up the vast majority of the market.

Beyond California, states challenging the deal include Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Washington.

Other regulatory clearances

Outside of the U.S., Paramount has touted greenlights from regulators in countries like China, Canada and Australia. But regulatory reviews are also ongoing in the European Union and the U.K., which has separately suggested it may intervene.

Meanwhile, the Writers Guild of America has filed its own lawsuit seeking to block the merger. And Paramount faces additional legal fights, including from a shareholder accusing CEO David Ellison and his father Larry Ellison (who is putting up tens of billions of dollars to back the deal for his son’s company) of promising “illegal, private benefits” to Trump in order to get the merger through.

Paramount has repeatedly dismissed such accusations, and the U.S. Justice Department maintained its review was not political.

Still, politics have come into question throughout Paramount's quest for Warner. Beyond Trump’s relationship with the Ellison family, critics of the deal also stress what new ownership could mean for Warner assets like CNN — a network that has long attracted ire from the Republican president — particularly in light of editorial turmoil at Paramount-owned CBS since Skydance’s takeover.

The contrast between the 12 states’ complaint, brought forth by all Democratic attorneys general, and the federal government’s blessing only underlines all of that further.

“It’s a political merger. It’s the product of the president’s engagement in private business affairs,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a webinar about the states' case last week. She maintained the states had been successful in challenging the Trump administration before and "we're not finished yet.”

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Money"

Read More

---

Source: Money

Published: July 21, 2026 at 12:19AM on Source: RED MAG

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

byRed Roads Media

in

3:00 PM

Judge says Paramount and Warner must halt merger for at least two weeks, granting states' request

Judge says Paramount and Warner must halt merger for at least two weeks, granting states&x27; request By WYATTE GRANTHAMPH...

Read More

Woman Sentenced to Life in Prison for the Murder of Her Newborn 29 Years Before Says She Doesn’t Remember Being Pregnant

Woman Sentenced to Life in Prison for the Murder of Her Newborn 29 Years Before Says She Doesn’t Remember Being Pregnant Alexandra SchonfeldMon, July 20, 2026 at 4:34 PM UTC 1 Gail Ritchey in court.Credit: Baby Doe, LLC The documentary Baby Doe explores how Gail Ritchey ended up being sentenced to life in prison for the murder of her newborn in 1993 The film, executiveproduced by Sarah Paulson, offers a frontrow look at Ritchey’s experience following her arrest in 2019 Baby Doe premiered in competition at SXSW in 2025 When asked if she ever took a pregnancy test for the child she gave birth to...

Woman Sentenced to Life in Prison for the Murder of Her Newborn 29 Years Before Says She Doesn’t Remember Being Pregnant

Alexandra SchonfeldMon, July 20, 2026 at 4:34 PM UTC

1

Gail Ritchey in court.Credit: Baby Doe, LLC -

The documentary Baby Doe explores how Gail Ritchey ended up being sentenced to life in prison for the murder of her newborn in 1993

The film, executive-produced by Sarah Paulson, offers a front-row look at Ritchey’s experience following her arrest in 2019

Baby Doe premiered in competition at SXSW in 2025

When asked if she ever took a pregnancy test for the child she gave birth to in 1993, Gail Ritchey’s answer is not as simple as a “yes” or “no.”

In the documentary Baby Doe, director Jessica Earnshaw takes a closer look at the case surrounding a baby who became known as “Geauga’s Child” after being found dead in a bag in 1993 in a wooded area of Geauga County, Ohio.

For years, the identity of the newborn was unknown, until genetic genealogy linked the child to Ritchey in 2019, leading to her arrest.

In the film, executive-produced by Sarah Paulson, Earnshaw follows Ritchey — now a mother of three adult children — and her family as they navigate life after the arrest and attempt to understand how they got there.

In 1993, Ritchey had already begun dating her now-husband Mark, whom she met in church. The two were sexually active before marriage, which was considered sinful behavior in their religion. This didn’t only lead to the pregnancy in question. In interviews with police, Ritchey admitted she gave birth to a child two years prior whose fate was similar to the baby at the center of the case (because only one baby was found, she wasn’t charged for the first baby’s death.)

Gail Ritchey and her husband Mark.Credit: Baby Doe, LLC

Ritchey told police at the time of her arrest that she didn’t know she was pregnant at the time of the baby’s birth. While speaking with her lawyer in the documentary, she admits she took a positive pregnancy test but has no memory of purchasing it, or what her reaction was to reading the result.

“I really don’t remember any memories from that point on as far as being pregnant,” she says.

Elsewhere, she explains what she does remember: “I didn’t purposely hide this pregnancy, either pregnancy. I wore the same clothes, ate the same way, just, you know, went on being who I was,” she says.

“I remember what happened that day almost like I wasn’t there,” she continues. “I just remember the motions. I went to work not feeling well. I remember needing to go to the bathroom, birthed the baby in the toilet. Not hearing anything, proceeded to the kitchen, got a trash bag, came back. Still not hearing anything.”

“I just know that I put everything into the bag. I don’t think I closed my eyes. I mean I looked in the direction of the bag, but I don’t remember seeing what I put in the bag,” she adds.

As explained in the documentary, Ritchey’s case is not completely unique and can be grouped with other women who claim to have experienced what is referred to as “unperceived pregnancies” or “pregnancy denial.”

While working on the case in the doc, her lawyer Steven Bradley sits down with forensic psychiatrist Cara Angelotta, who explains that there is a “subset of pregnancy denial where they know they’re pregnant, but for long stretches of the pregnancy they’re able to put it out of their mind. It’s like when someone has an obvious tumor and they just pretend like it’s not there and will show up when it’s really, really bad.”

The poster for ‘Baby Doe’Credit: Baby Doe, LLC

“With the onset of labor, the disassociative symptoms are pretty common,” she says, adding, “It’s also possible… for the person who gave birth to not perceive the baby as alive.”

She explains that the fact that it happened once before points even more to the possibility that this psychological phenomenon was a factor.

As her lawyers prepare for the trial, they call Ritchey to again ask her what she recalls from the time of her pregnancy.

Advertisement

“I don’t recall thinking I was pregnant,” she tells them. When Bradley asks what she means by that, she says: “That I didn’t know I was pregnant.”

Bradley again brings up the positive pregnancy test, insisting she would have known after that. She responds: “Yes, probably, yes, but I don’t remember noticing it physically.”

As Bradley explains, Ohio does not recognize diminished capacity defense and ultimatelydid not allow the defense to have expert witnesses speak to the mental health component at play. Instead, her lawyers had to focus on the science and their belief that it’s not possible to prove the baby was born alive.

Looking back at what happened, Ritchey’s husband Mark says, “I should have proposed and gotten married sooner.”

Steven Bradley in court.Credit: Baby Doe, LLC

“She was in a position that I put her in. It was an unplanned pregnancy. We weren’t married, and that created the dissociation with the pregnancy,” he adds.

During the trial, which included a predominantly male jury, an expert witness for the prosecution says there was proof the baby did breathe following birth — though the defense says that’s not a conclusion that can be made as they do not know the cause of death. The prosecution also presented photos of the baby after it was found, lying on an autopsy table. The trial was the first time Ritchey had seen the images.

“Yesterday, when I was looking at the pictures, seeing the baby made it real,” she says in the film. “I was sitting there, kind of swaying like I was holding him, and I just kept saying, ‘Sorry.’ Sorry that I didn’t try and do something to help. Sorry that I didn’t call for some help. Sorry for abandoning him.”

Ultimately, the jury found Ritchey not guilty of the count of aggravated murder but guilty of the count of murder, and she was taken into custody immediately with her bail revoked.

“I feel responsible, and no matter what you say, I will always feel responsible,” Mark writes in a letter to his wife in jail, later turning to the camera to add: “She’ll tell you that I was the best thing to ever happen to her, and I’ll tell you, she deserved better than me.”

In 2022, Ritchey was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole in 15 years. During her sentencing, which is shown in the film, the judge tells her she “took the easy way out.”

“I acknowledge you’ve since led a respectable, gracious life, so I can’t rationalize these two Gail Ritcheys, I won’t even try,” he says, later concluding, “Calling you a monster who deserves life in imprisonment might not be an unfair exaggeration.”

Before escorting her out of the room where her virtual sentencing took place, a corrections officer tells Ritchey: “I’ve known a lot of people in here. I’ve seen a lot of people who are monsters. You’re not a monster.”

Both the Ohio Supreme Court and U.S. Supreme Court declined her request to review the case.

The film is screening in theaters across the country this month with digital distribution planned in the fall.

A post from Paulson about the documentary, which is screening in select U.S. theaters this summer with digital distribution planned for the fall, says, “Baby Doe looks beyond the headlines to reveal the human complexity of Gail’s case, exploring how women’s health, justice and powerful outside forces shape stories like hers.”

on People

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Entertainment"

Read More

---

Source: Entertainment

Published: July 20, 2026 at 11:01PM on Source: RED MAG

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

byRed Roads Media

in

2:00 PM

Woman Sentenced to Life in Prison for the Murder of Her Newborn 29 Years Before Says She Doesn’t Remember Being Pregnant

Woman Sentenced to Life in Prison for the Murder of Her Newborn 29 Years Before Says She Doesn’t Remember Being Pregnant Al...

Read More

Trump Shares Photo of JD and Usha Vance’s Newborn Son Alec, the First Baby Born to a VP in over 150 Years

Trump Shares Photo of JD and Usha Vance’s Newborn Son Alec, the First Baby Born to a VP in over 150 Years Joseph KonigMon, July 20, 2026 at 3:47 PM UTC 213 Vice President JD Vance’s children, including his newborn son Alec, who second lady Usha Vance gave birth to on Sunday, July 19Credit: Donald Trump/Truth Social President Donald Trump shared the first photo of Vice President JD Vance’s fourth child with second lady Usha Vance Alec Neel Vance was born “happy and healthy” on Sunday, July 19, the couple announced On Monday, July 20, the president shared the first public photo of Alec being hel...

Trump Shares Photo of JD and Usha Vance’s Newborn Son Alec, the First Baby Born to a VP in over 150 Years

Joseph KonigMon, July 20, 2026 at 3:47 PM UTC

213

Vice President JD Vance’s children, including his newborn son Alec, who second lady Usha Vance gave birth to on Sunday, July 19Credit: Donald Trump/Truth Social -

President Donald Trump shared the first photo of Vice President JD Vance’s fourth child with second lady Usha Vance

Alec Neel Vance was born “happy and healthy” on Sunday, July 19, the couple announced

On Monday, July 20, the president shared the first public photo of Alec being held by his brother Vivek in the hospital next to his sister, Mirabel

President Donald Trump has shared the first photo of Vice President JD Vance’s fourth child with second lady Usha Vance, Alec Neel Vance, who was born on Sunday, July 19.

The couple announced the birth of their baby boy on Sunday, writing in an Instagram post that “Usha and the baby are happy and healthy” and that their older three children — Ewan, 9; Vivek, 6; and Mirabel, 4 — were “overjoyed to meet their little brother.

On Monday, July 20, the president shared the first public photo of Alec being held by his brother Vivek in the hospital next to his sister, Mirabel.

“Congratulations! A perfect baby boy for the wonderful Vance family,” Trump, who has five children, wrote on Truth Social.

The baby boy’s birth was the second known time a second lady has given birth during her tenure and the first in more than 150 years.

Ellen Wade Colfax — the wife of Ulysses S. Grant’s vice president, Schuyler Colfax Jr. — gave birth to a son in 1870.

JD, 41, and Usha, 40, thanked “the incredible military doctors and staff members of Walter Reed Medical Center and the White House Medical Unit” in their Sunday post.

“We are deeply thankful for all they have done for our family,” the couple added.

Advertisement

The Vances announced that Usha was pregnant in January.

In May, the vice president told NBC News that he won’t take a “formal” parental leave following the birth of his fourth child, but plans to spend more time at home as the family balances the demands of his job with the birth of their new son.

The vice president’s office referred PEOPLE to those comments when reached for comment on Monday.

— sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

Vice President JD Vance and his family, including wife, Usha Vance, visit the Taj Mahal on April 23 in Agra, India.Credit: Kenny Holston - Pool/Getty

Usha, who worked as a trial lawyer prior to coming to Washington, will “take a long period out of the public eye” following Alec’s birth, her husband said in the same interview.

“It’s one of these jobs where it’s impossible to completely disconnect from it,” Vance said in May. “The good thing about having a little bit of control over your schedule in your life is that you can incorporate your kids in your job in a way that they love.”

“I think it’ll mean the kids are probably here at the White House more than they have been the last few months, and I’ll probably be at home a little bit more, and we’ll just make it work,” he added.

on People

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Entertainment"

Read More

---

Source: Entertainment

Published: July 20, 2026 at 11:01PM on Source: RED MAG

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

byRed Roads Media

in

2:00 PM

Trump Shares Photo of JD and Usha Vance’s Newborn Son Alec, the First Baby Born to a VP in over 150 Years

Trump Shares Photo of JD and Usha Vance’s Newborn Son Alec, the First Baby Born to a VP in over 150 Years Joseph KonigMon, Ju...

Read More

World Cup fans say Shakira 'saved the day' after Justin Bieber's performance is slammed

World Cup fans say Shakira &x27;saved the day&x27; after Justin Bieber&x27;s performance is slammed Niti MajethiaSun, July 19, 2026 at 8:48 PM UTC 0 Shakira won over fans with her energetic performance Credit:Getty Images The FIFA World Cup 2026 halftime show brought out a starstudded lineup of musicians—including Shakira, Justin Bieber, Madonna, and BTS—doing what they do best. However, despite the exciting lineup, some fans were less thrilled about Justin Bieber&x27;s performance. The Baby singer performed one of his viral hits, "EVERYTHING HALLELUJAH," a slow, soulful song about gratitude.

World Cup fans say Shakira 'saved the day' after Justin Bieber's performance is slammed

Niti MajethiaSun, July 19, 2026 at 8:48 PM UTC

0

Shakira won over fans with her energetic performance -Credit:Getty Images

The FIFA World Cup 2026 halftime show brought out a star-studded lineup of musicians—including Shakira, Justin Bieber, Madonna, and BTS—doing what they do best. However, despite the exciting lineup, some fans were less thrilled about Justin Bieber's performance. The Baby singer performed one of his viral hits, "EVERYTHING HALLELUJAH," a slow, soulful song about gratitude.

Many viewers complained about how the song's "slow" pace did not match the World Cup's energy, with someone writing on X, "Justin Bieber chose the song very poorly." Another viewer commented on the underwhelming production, stating, "Justin Bieber performing at halftime felt just like when your musician friend pulls out their guitar at a party."

Advertisement

In contrast, Shakira, who has a longstanding association with the tournament, bust out an energetic performance with complex choreography to her song 'Dai Dai,' which is also the official song for the 2026 World Cup. Fans flooded social media with praises for the singer, with one noting, "Shakira moving to save the day after the a-- Justin Bieber did." While another said, "sorry but only shakira felt like an actual WORLD CUP performance." The highly anticipated performance even had prediction markets rife with speculation on which song Shakira would perform first.

• The Cure's frontman bashes World Cup halftime show as he tells FIFA to 'just f— off'

• World Cup closing ceremony in chaos as viewers left confused over delayed Robbie Williams performance

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Entertainment"

Read More

---

Source: Entertainment

Published: July 20, 2026 at 12:10AM on Source: RED MAG

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

byRed Roads Media

in

3:00 PM

World Cup fans say Shakira 'saved the day' after Justin Bieber's performance is slammed

World Cup fans say Shakira &x27;saved the day&x27; after Justin Bieber&x27;s performance is slammed Niti MajethiaSun,...

Read More