A candidate operating for the Los Angeles Supervisor position is getting candid concerning the reasons behind his new insurance policies — they usually’re deeply private.

In a moving video campaign that was shared final Monday, the L.A. City Council President Herb Wesson revealed that his adult son Doug is homeless and addicted to crack cocaine.

Wesson’s wife narrates the video as her husband desperately searches Los Angeles’ notorious Skid Row.

She says, that despite her husband’s busy schedule, he all the time finds time to go seek for their son round Los Angeles and try and coax him into rehab.

As seen within the video, the dedicated father, 68, is seen chatting with many individuals within the homeless group and handing out flyers to see if they will determine Doug or help him find his son.

RELATED: 12-Year-Old Middle Schooler Has Helped Feed 9,000 Homeless People: ‘I Want to Help Them All’

“He gained’t hand over on anyone, like a dad who loves his son,” his spouse says in the video.

The second clip exhibits Wesson continuing his dedicated search, while his spouse candidly admits how they’ve struggled to return to terms with how their adult son is at present dwelling.

“Nobody expects their youngster to end up right here,” she says, noting that her husband has expanded supportive providers within the area to assist those struggling from continual drug habit and mental sickness.

Lastly, Wesson is pointed in the fitting course by someone who knows the place Doug is — and by the top of the clip, the father-son duo is reunited.

“You pray for a cheerful ending,” his wife says. “Perhaps this time.”

RELATED VIDEO: You Should Meet the N.Y.C. Trader Who’s Utilizing Music to Assist the Homeless

It’s due to that emotional connection that Wesson is choosing to focus his platform and insurance policies on ending homelessness in Los Angeles.

In addition to sharing his message, Wesson used the video campaign to spotlight a number of Los Angeles charities which are targeted on ending homelessness, together with Jenesse Middle, Inc., The Weingart Middle Association, United Means, and LA CAN.


Src: L.A. Supervisor Candidate Reveals Desperate Search for Missing Son in Heartbreaking Campaign Video
==============================
New Smart Way Get BITCOINS!
CHECK IT NOW!
==============================

L.A. Supervisor Candidate Reveals Desperate Search for Missing Son in Heartbreaking Campaign Video

A candidate operating for the Los Angeles Supervisor position is getting candid concerning the reasons behind his new insurance policies — t...

Src: Trump timebomb lands in British election campaign
==============================
New Smart Way Get BITCOINS!
CHECK IT NOW!
==============================

Trump timebomb lands in British election campaign

Src: Trump timebomb lands in British election campaign ============================== New Smart Way Get BITCOINS! CHECK IT NOW! =======...

Src: POLITICO 28: The most powerful people in Europe — ranked
==============================
New Smart Way Get BITCOINS!
CHECK IT NOW!
==============================

POLITICO 28: The most powerful people in Europe — ranked

Src: POLITICO 28: The most powerful people in Europe — ranked ============================== New Smart Way Get BITCOINS! CHECK IT NOW! ...

First France went after Google and Amazon with a recent set of taxes. On Monday, President Donald Trump threatened to retaliate towards two beloved French exports: Champagne and cheese.

This latest international trade dispute pits Trump towards a long-standing ally, months after France permitted a “digital providers tax” aimed toward making main U.S.-based tech corporations like Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon fork over extra revenue.

The difficulty had been on the backburner since August, after Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron agreed to a 90-day truce whereas they tried to succeed in a long-term settlement on how tech corporations must be taxed. That deadline passed last week and not using a deal.

On Monday, the Workplace of the U.S. Commerce Consultant released results of an investigation that decided that France's tax unfairly discriminates towards huge U.S. tech corporations.

If another answer is not worked out, tech corporations might pay lots of of hundreds of thousands of more dollars in taxes and U.S. shoppers would have should pay double for Dom Pérignon, Le Creuset cookware and Roquefort cheese.



U.S officials also indicated they might investigate different European nations considering digital tax plans, placing them in cross-hairs of future tariff action in the event that they comply with by way of. They also stated they have been prepared to counter Europe’s broader regulatory clampdown on American tech companies.

The newest salvo threatens to further strain relations with France and other European nations during this week's NATO meeting in London, which Trump is attending. With tensions rising, here’s what you could know concerning the tussle:


Why would the French start a tax struggle with tech corporations?

Some European nations have been moaning for years about missed tax revenue from tech giants, lots of which have tons of of hundreds of thousands of customers across the area but pay virtually nothing into national coffers. Broader, digital tax proposals at the European Union went nowhere, so individual nations pushed forward on their personal.

France received there first: Lawmakers earlier this yr passed a 3 % digital providers tax on any tech company with international revenues of more than €750 million, of which at the least €25 million comes from French customers. Nations together with Spain, Austria and the United Kingdom have proposed comparable guidelines, hoping to pocket a slice of the billions that a few of Silicon Valley’s largest names generate annually.


Why is Trump sticking up for giant tech corporations?

It’s difficult. He has repeatedly accused Twitter, Facebook and Google of censoring and suppressing conservative speech on their platforms, although evidence is lacking and the businesses deny it.

Trump's most acrimonious tech relationship is with Amazon and its CEO, Jeff Bezos, whom he has repeatedly bashed on Twitter. The president’s criticism is usually associated to protection within the Bezos-owned Washington Submit. He also has attacked Amazon for not paying state and local taxes, regardless that it has in current years.

Trump champions some tech innovation, nevertheless, given its potential to grow the financial system: The U.S. is a pacesetter in robotics, driverless automobiles and synthetic intelligence.

Trump has defended the tech business on the international stage, most prominently by going after China for theft of American intellectual property. He additionally has lashed out at European regulators’ antitrust and tax investigations of massive tech corporations, though his administration has launched comparable probes.



His message appears to be: “We will beat up on our personal tech companies, however foreigners hold your arms off.”


What do Champagne and cheese tariffs should do with Facebook and Google?

Trump’s chief commerce official, Robert Lighthizer, is threatening France with 100 % tariffs on as much as $2.four billion value of French products — together with Champagne, cheeses, purses, soaps and wonderful dinnerware. He additionally stated the U.S. might impose charges or restrictions on French providers companies, reminiscent of banking and engineering corporations, working in america. The final tally of any retaliation is predicted to mirror the estimated harm of the new digital providers tax on U.S. corporations.

Lighthizer is giving importers a chance to argue that sure gadgets ought to be excluded from the duties. On the flip aspect, domestic producers or farmers can push for other products to be slapped with tariffs.

Once a public remark period is all carried out, Lighthizer will situation a remaining listing of products and providers topic to onerous tariffs, charges or restrictions. The measures stick till Trump is glad France has addressed U.S. considerations, both by modifying the tax or killing it.


Can Trump beat the French?

Trump is imposing the taxes utilizing a provision referred to as “Section 301,” which Congress accepted in 1974 as part of broader commerce laws. It permits the administration to retaliate towards overseas trade strikes that harm U.S. corporations.

The U.S. stopped using it after the nations agreed in the mid-1990s to create a worldwide overseer of commerce — the World Trade Organization — and its binding dispute-settlement system. However Trump has revived use of the 1974 regulation, despite the fact that it appears to be at odds with WTO rules towards unilaterally elevating tariffs. [The administration is separately undercutting the WTO’s ability to settle disputes.]

When nations impose retaliation, together with in these instances accredited by the WTO, they try to hit products that may maximize strain on their rivals to vary coverage. That's what Trump is doing by concentrating on French glowing wine and cheese, whereas concurrently giving a boost to domestic corporations.


Why shouldn’t tech corporations pay their justifiable share in Europe?

The Trump administration says the tax is structured to punish giant U.S. corporations which might be major players and spare French companies doing comparable work on a a lot smaller scale. French policy makers fueled the notion with references to the brand new levy as a “GAFA” tax — brief for Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon.

The U.S. additionally worries a lot of other nations, in the hunt for new tax income, might comply with France’s lead. Even shut trade allies like Canada have stated they need to impose comparable taxes. Some of probably the most successful U.S. corporations might quickly face an internet of discriminatory taxes all over the world, giving home rivals in each of these markets a bonus.

Additionally, america says France and others contemplating a digital providers tax are intruding into an space where the U.S. has taxing rights, but they don’t.


How does this finish?

Discussions are happening. In October, the Group for Economic Cooperation and Improvement, a gaggle of principally wealthy nations, announced it would create a worldwide set of rules to divvy up a few of the income created by the world’s tech giants.


The hope is for an preliminary agreement in early 2020 about how particular person nations can impose their own tax guidelines. Finance ministers representing the Group of 20 nations mentioned in current weeks the proposals that may require unanimous help.

Even the French and People have shown a willingness to work with one another, regardless of the continued menace of potential economic sanctions.

However with roughly six weeks to go before the OECD’s self-imposed deadline to succeed in a worldwide settlement, any renewed rigidity between the U.S. and France might throw the yearslong negotiations into jeopardy.

Steven Overly and Aaron Lorenzo contributed to this report.


Article initially revealed on POLITICO Magazine


Src: Trump’s latest trade war: French champagne vs. Google taxes
==============================
New Smart Way Get BITCOINS!
CHECK IT NOW!
==============================

Trump’s latest trade war: French champagne vs. Google taxes

First France went after Google and Amazon with a recent set of taxes. On Monday, President Donald Trump threatened to retaliate towards tw...

President Donald Trump is profitable at the very least one commerce warfare: The one together with his personal celebration.

Free-trading Republicans have feuded with the president for years now, and his choice on Monday to reimpose tariffs on Brazil and Argentina brought new criticism from GOP senators — proper as he needs them to fend off the impeachment inquiry that threatens his presidency.

But regardless of the complaints from Senate Republicans that Trump is eroding his get together’s free trade bona fides, the GOP seemingly can’t — or gained’t — rally the votes to handcuff the president. Competing proposals that may give Congress more sway over certain tariffs have been languishing within the Senate Finance Committee, leaving more establishment-minded Republicans little choice but to take a seat again and gripe and marvel what just hit them.

“I’m not a tariff individual and he is aware of that,” stated Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa). “If we will arrive at a superb [trade] deal, that’s nice, but I actually, I hate the tariffs."

Trump’s move to deploy tariffs on the aluminum and steel imports for national security causes is particularly galling for some.

"This provision is solely meant for nationwide safety threats. But, the president has acknowledged that the actual function of this action is to combat foreign money manipulation — which does not pose a national safety menace," stated Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.). "Even if this action have been authentic, the statutory window for imposing these tariffs has closed."



The battle between Trump and the Republican Social gathering could be very actual, maybe probably the most persistent disagreement between the president and the senators who sometimes function his allies. But again and again the Senate GOP has shied away from direct combat with Trump. Any speak of sanctioning Turkey, reforming the National Emergencies Act or proscribing Trump’s tariffs has all been shortly sidelined. And no one on Capitol Hill thinks the GOP frustration on trade will dim help for Trump on impeachment.

Toomey and Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) proposed separate bills that gave Congress more sway on nationwide security-based tariffs, with Toomey’s even requiring Congress to approve of them. But with an impeachment trial looming and Republicans targeted on securing a brand new North American commerce deal, the concept the GOP may stop Trump from imposing these tariffs is slipping.

Finance Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) stated that until the brand new North American commerce settlement is handled, his committee has “put it off.” He also endorsed the newest tariffs, which Trump stated was have been imposed to crack down on devalued currencies in Argentina and Brazil.

“Normally I don’t like tariffs but if it’s a software to make individuals reside by the principles of international commerce, I’ll help them,” Grassley stated.

“I’m not a tariff man, however then again in the event that they’re manipulating foreign money?” stated Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.)

Other Republicans have been left befuddled, with some privately seeing Trump’s newest move as retaliation for the South American nations selling soybean to China. Absent more info, senators stated they couldn’t actually explain Trump’s newest transfer.

“It doesn’t seem like nationwide security. However I can’t inform what it's yet or what they’re making an attempt to perform,” stated Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.). He stated in the long run, Congress has to take a look at taking back some of its authority however acknowledged action to tie Trump’s palms gained’t happen: “In the brief term? No.”

Senate Majority Chief Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and lots of of his members cause that extra may be gained in personal communications with the president than in outright legislative warfare with him. They consider that their work to cease the president from imposing broad tariffs on Mexico earlier this yr or imposing tariffs on overseas autos did much more good than confrontation with the president.

Former Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) disagreed, opposing Trump’s judicial nominees in his ultimate term in hopes of driving a debate on tariffs. But Flake is gone and few within the get together appear to need to take any comparable stand towards the president presently.


“It’s considerably controversial,” stated Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) of Trump’s view that imported metal poses dangers to national safety. Congress “provides much broader powers to the chief government than we contemplated however … absent a presidential signature, it’s exhausting to claw that authority back once it’s given.”

The temper on the Republican aspect was principally resignation — and Trump appears to comprehend it. He gave no heads up to most members of his own social gathering before hitting send on his tweet saying the tariffs, prompting Lankford to start studying up on the difficulty and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) to seek extra details about whether it will affect corporations in his residence state.

“Brazil and Argentina have been presiding over an enormous devaluation of their currencies. which is not good for our farmers,” Trump tweeted, arguing that the financial system has surged since he began his tariff regime.

However Johnson gave an audible sigh when asked concerning the latest spherical of levies.

Johnson has referred to as bailouts to farmers part of a “Soviet-type financial system,” has warned trade uncertainty might harm the U.S. financial system and worked to defend his state from the consequences of beforehand threatened tariffs towards the two nations.

And as soon as again, he was going to need to cope with the fallout from Trump’s commerce policies.

“We fought exhausting for an exemption, finally received it and now they’re throwing this,” Johnson stated. “So we’re involved. I’m involved.”


Article initially revealed on POLITICO Magazine


Src: Trump conquers Republicans on trade
==============================
New Smart Way Get BITCOINS!
CHECK IT NOW!
==============================

Trump conquers Republicans on trade

President Donald Trump is profitable at the very least one commerce warfare: The one together with his personal celebration. Free-trading ...

EMMETSBURG, Iowa — Former Vice President Joe Biden on Monday stated he didn’t need Barack Obama’s endorsement within the Democratic main, even if the sector have been down to 3 individuals.

He additionally scoffed at the notion that Sen. Elizabeth Warren is building enthusiasm and accused Mayor Pete Buttigieg of stealing his plans.

In a wide-ranging interview aboard his marketing campaign bus during an eight-day, “No Malarkey“ tour via rural Iowa, a feisty Biden answered questions for 30 minutes, discussing his prospects in Iowa, the possible power of his campaign going into Super Tuesday and his relationship with the previous president.

Biden reiterated that he requested Obama not to endorse him, and he caught by that stance even when asked whether or not he’d need Obama’s backing if the sector narrowed to 3 individuals.

“No, as a result of everyone is aware of I’m shut with him,” Biden stated. “I don’t need an Obama endorsement.”

Biden went on to say that as Obama’s vice presidential decide, he offered crucial relationships with the bottom of the Democratic Get together, including with African People. Biden was requested a few POLITICO Magazine article that just lately reported how Obama had confided in one other candidate that his former vice chairman “really doesn’t have it” with regards to an intimate connection with voters.

“He might have stated that. And if it’s true, and he stated it, there’s fact to it,” Biden acknowledged on Monday before saying that he has “principally campaigned for different individuals in the time I’ve been right here. And I’ve never been able in search of the nomination the place I have had the money and the group to be capable of get open headquarters everywhere in the state.”

On his prospects in Iowa and beyond, Biden stated that if he gained the first caucus state, it will be “awful exhausting to cease me from profitable the nomination.”



Biden lamented media protection that he stated initially dismissed the durability of his candidacy because he was too average and didn‘t embrace policies like Medicare for All. Biden stated the area was now shifting closer to his views and away from the left. When requested whether or not he unintentionally set the stage for Buttigieg, who's main within the polls in Iowa, Biden grew animated.

“Set it up? He stole it! Set it up?” Biden stated of the mayor of South Bend, Ind.

When requested whether Buttigieg now had the keenness and the average positioning, he again scoffed. “No, he doesn’t have the keenness and the average — average plan. It’s the Biden plan.”

The former vice chairman then accused the media of going too straightforward on Buttigieg, saying his opponent had once supported a more liberal health care plan but then pivoted. Buttigieg embraces a plan he calls “Medicare for All Who Need It,“ and he has advertised heavily in Iowa and different early-voting states on that proposal.

Biden contended that if he had supported one plan then shifted toward another plan that seemed like that of an opponent‘s, the media would have proven him no mercy.

"What would you could have executed to me? You'd have torn my ears off," Biden advised reporters. "I might be a plagiarizing, no good, previous man who did bum bum bum.”

When asked about another polling leader in Iowa and elsewhere — Warren — Biden dismissed her rise and the notion that she had momentum behind her.

“Take a look at the polling all over the place. Tell me. Tell me where the polling has manifested itself,” he stated. “She lives in Massachusetts, she’s invested tens of millions and hundreds of thousands of dollars in New Hampshire, why shouldn’t she be recognized there?”

Biden has grown defensive over the extent of enthusiasm behind his candidacy and the turnout at his events, which have usually drawn smaller, older crowds in Iowa. Whereas Biden‘s marketing campaign has stated the previous vice chairman is operating a unique campaign with extra intimate meet-and-greets, it‘s occurring in the face of a current swell of help for Buttigieg, who has drawn more than 2,000 individuals at a time in some elements of Iowa.

Biden demanded that reporters give him examples of massive crowds for Warren. When a reporter cited a current giant turnout for Warren in Chicago, Biden grew sarcastic.

“Oh, nice, she had a displaying in Chicago,” he stated. “By the best way, that’s an exquisite factor. Show me any numbers.”

After the interview, Biden left the bus and boarded a flight to a personal fundraiser in Chicago.

Marc Caputo contributed to this report.


Article initially revealed on POLITICO Magazine


Src: Biden says he doesn’t need Obama’s endorsement
==============================
New Smart Way Get BITCOINS!
CHECK IT NOW!
==============================

Biden says he doesn’t need Obama’s endorsement

EMMETSBURG, Iowa — Former Vice President Joe Biden on Monday stated he didn’t need Barack Obama’s endorsement within the Democratic main, e...

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) on Monday unveiled the listing of constitutional students set to testify within the committee’s first impeachment hearing on Wednesday.

Democrats will name Noah Feldman, a Harvard Regulation professor, Pamela Karlan, a regulation professor at Stanford, and Michael Gerhardt, a regulation professor at the University of North Carolina.

Republicans on the panel, meanwhile, will name Jonathan Turley, a regulation professor at George Washington College who has written extensively concerning the Trump impeachment inquiry, as their witness.

Wednesday’s listening to is about to concentrate on laying out the constitutional grounds for impeachment, as Democrats look to make the case that Trump violated his oath of office by trying to leverage army help and a possible White Home go to to strain Ukraine's president to decide to political probes. Republicans, faced with a harmful set of details specified by two weeks of public testimony final month, will argue that Democrats haven't uncovered proof that Trump‘s conduct is impeachable.

Trump on Monday slammed Democrats for scheduling the listening to whereas he’ll be in London for a meeting with fellow NATO leaders, complaining about every little thing from the timing of the hearing to the stability of Democratic versus Republican-called witnesses. His broadsides come in the future after the White House confirmed to Nadler that it did not plan to take part in Wednesday's hearing, dismissing it as a “baseless” and “partisan” exercise.

Shortly earlier than the lineup of witnesses was released, the highest Republican on the committee, Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, ripped Nadler in a letter for not having introduced the slate earlier, in addition to the shortage of an impeachment report from Home Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and details about additional hearings from the panel.


While Democrats tapped Gerhardt for Wednesday’s listening to, his experience prior to now has been sought by each side of the aisle. He’s testified multiple occasions by way of invites from both Republicans and Democrats who needed to hear him talk about his books and other revealed research, together with a conclusion he reached in 1996 that impeachable offenses weren’t restricted to only felony acts.

Gerhardt has remained a go-to voice on impeachment in the course of the Trump period. In September, he stated the president’s legal scattershot strategy was partially “to only produce confusion and chaos.”

“That’s served him properly until now,” he told POLITICO. “It’s his approach of blowing smoke. And so having totally different individuals talking for him in several methods and at totally different occasions, and his personal bluster on Twitter and elsewhere, all that collectively is his protection. It’s designed to keep individuals off stability.”

Turley can also be no stranger to congressional impeachment fights. In 2010, he served as lead defense counsel within the Senate impeachment trial that ended within the removing of U.S. District Decide G. Thomas Porteous, an appointee of President Bill Clinton convicted on four articles tied to expenses including corruption. The lead House impeachment supervisor in these proceedings: Rep. Adam Schiff.

In September, former Trump White House lawyer Ty Cobb floated in an interview with POLITICO each Turley and Alan Dershowitz as potential hires for the president should he choose to mount a more forceful impeachment defense.

Feldman, who's a contributing writer to Bloomberg Opinion, has additionally weighed in on Democrats‘ case for impeachment quite commonly, including an Oct. 20 piece titled “Trump’s Quid Professional Quo Is Unconstitutional.“

Additionally Monday, Trump’s private legal workforce mocked the Democrats for turning to constitutional specialists slightly than first-hand witnesses who might determine impeachment-worthy conduct by the president.

“There’s nothing the American individuals need to hear less than a bunch of overly educated regulation professors give their advice” about impeachment, Jordan Sekulow, an lawyer for the president, stated on his father’s speak radio present.

Showing before the House panel named its witnesses, Jordan Sekulow stated a number of the president’s private legal professionals planned to dig into the revealed work of the professors seeking controversy.

“I can’t wait to seek out out what crazy stuff the regulation professors have written,” Jordan Sekulow stated. “I guess anti-Israel, borderline anti-Semitic. Perhaps anti-American?”


Article initially revealed on POLITICO Magazine


Src: House Judiciary reveals witnesses for first impeachment hearing
==============================
New Smart Way Get BITCOINS!
CHECK IT NOW!
==============================

House Judiciary reveals witnesses for first impeachment hearing

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) on Monday unveiled the listing of constitutional students set to testify within the committe...

 

RED MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com