J.K. Rowling Tells Police to Arrest Her Under the New Hate Crime Laws | T0X0GY9 | 2024-04-02 23:08:01
J.K. Rowling Tells Police to Arrest Her Under the New Hate Crime Laws | T0X0GY9 | 2024-04-02 23:08:01
Harry Potter writer J.K. Rowling has dared police to arrest her as new hate crime laws come into impact in the U.Okay.
The 58-year-old, who has repeatedly voiced her disagreement with the Scottish authorities's views on transgender rights, slammed the brand new guidelines — which are to be enforced within the nation beginning Tuesday, April, 2 — in a collection of messages posted by way of X.
In view of her 14 million followers, she wrote: "Freedom of speech and belief are at an finish in Scotland if the correct description of biological intercourse is deemed felony."
She added: "I'm at present overseas, but if what I've written here qualifies as an offense beneath the terms of the new act, I sit up for being arrested once I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment."
Museum Removes J.K. Rowling From Displays Over Transphobic Comments
Rowling additionally argued that the brand new regulation might lead to campaigners being wrongfully arrested.
"It is unimaginable to accurately describe or deal with the truth of violence and sexual violence dedicated towards ladies and women, or handle the present assault on ladies's and women' rights, until we are allowed to name a person a person," she argued. "The laws is broad open to abuse by activists who wish to silence those of us talking out concerning the dangers of eliminating ladies's and women' single-sex spaces."
She ended her submit with the hashtags, "#ArrestMe #AprilFools #HateCrimeActScotland."
Rowling's feedback came after the Scottish parliament warned that Scots "might be investigated" for wrongly labeling someone's gender online beneath the new rules of The Hate Crime and Public Order Act. The brand new measures purpose to deal with the hurt brought on by hatred and prejudice, extending protections from abusive conduct to individuals on grounds together with age, incapacity, faith, sexual orientation and transgender id.
Last yr, Rowling admitted that she would do prison time for her transgender views. In October 2023, she shared a photograph by way of X which read, "Repeat After Us: Trans Ladies Are Ladies," to which she replied, "No."
"I'll happily do two years if the choice is compelled speech and forced denial of the truth and significance of intercourse," she continued. "Deliver on the courtroom case, I say. It'll be extra enjoyable than I've ever had on a purple carpet."
Sarah Paulson and More Celebs Respond to J.K.Rowling's Anti-Trans Tweets
The writer initially sparked backlash back in 2019 when she tweeted her help for a British researcher who lost her job after making transphobic comments online.
"Gown nevertheless you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting grownup who'll have you. Reside your greatest life in peace and security," Rowling tweeted on the time. "However pressure ladies out of their jobs for stating that sex is actual? #IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill."
Less than one yr later, Rowling posted a series of controversial tweets in June 2020, writing, "'Individuals who menstruate.' I'm positive there was a phrase for these individuals. Somebody assist me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?"
She continued: "If intercourse isn't real, the lived actuality of girls globally is erased. I do know and love trans individuals, but erasing the idea of sex removes the power of many to meaningfully talk about their lives. It isn't hate to talk the reality."
A number of days after receiving backlash for her tweets and being labeled a "TERF" (trans-exclusionary radical feminist), Rowling responded in a prolonged essay defending her opinions.
"It isn't sufficient for ladies to be trans allies," she wrote on the time. "Ladies must accept and admit that there isn't a material difference between trans ladies and themselves. But, as many ladies have stated before me, 'lady' just isn't a fancy dress. … The 'inclusive' language that calls feminine individuals 'menstruators' and 'individuals with vulvas' strikes many ladies as dehumanizing and demeaning. I perceive why trans activists contemplate this language to be applicable and type, but for those of us who've had degrading slurs spat at us by violet men, it's not impartial, it's hostile and alienating."
More >> https://ift.tt/HMyfj5b Source: MAG NEWS
No comments: