Facebook vs. Twitter on political ads: What Zuckerberg said, how Dorsey responded

Twitter's announcement Wednesday that it will ban political and issues advertising added a brand new degree of friction to its long-running rivalry with Fb, which has faced more than a month of blowback for refusing to penalize candidates for lying in their ads.

The transfer came every week after Fb founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg suffered a grilling on Capitol Hill, especially from Democrats, over his company’s disinterest in insisting on truthfulness in political promoting — including to its issues in Washington as it faces a potential antitrust probe and criticism about its handling of customers' knowledge.

In announcing the new policy, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey took a couple of apparent photographs at the arguments Zuckerberg and others have made for permitting misleading political advertisements. In a speech Oct. 17 at Georgetown College, Zuckerberg framed the issue as one of "free expression" and letting voters, not tech corporations, decide politicians' arguments. But Dorsey stated it is a matter of protecting democracy within the face of the web's "growing velocity, sophistication, and overwhelming scale."

Reality checking political advertisements
MARK ZUCKERBERG ON OCT. 17
“We don’t fact-check political advertisements. And we don’t do this to help politicians, but because we expect individuals should have the ability to see for themselves what politicians are saying. … I know many people disagree with this, however basically, I don’t assume it’s right for a personal firm to censor politicians or the news in a democracy.”
Read more from Zuckerberg's speech

Favoring incumbents
MARK ZUCKERBERG ON OCT. 17
“Political advertisements could be an essential part of voice, especially for local candidates and up-and-coming challengers and advocacy teams the media won't in any other case cover, in order that approach they will get their voice into the talk. Banning political advertisements favors incumbents and whoever the media chooses to cover.”

Free expression vs. pay-per-view
MARK ZUCKERBERG ON OCT. 17
“In occasions of social pressure, our impulse is usually to tug again on free expression because we would like the progress that comes from free expression however we do not need the strain. We noticed this when Martin Luther King Jr. wrote his well-known letter from a Birmingham jail where he was unconstitutionally jailed for protesting peacefully. ... In the long run, all of these selections have been improper.”

Article originally revealed on POLITICO Magazine

Src: Facebook vs. Twitter on political ads: What Zuckerberg said, how Dorsey responded
==============================
New Smart Way Get BITCOINS!
CHECK IT NOW!
==============================